Image: Penn State Extension Shale Education Team
A new U.S. Geological Survey study revealed that unconventional oil and gas production in the Eagle Ford, Fayetteville, and Haynesville shale formations is not currently a significant source of methane or benzene to drinking water wells. Decades or longer may be needed to fully assess the effects of unconventional oil and gas production on the quality of groundwater used for drinking water.
While the Marcellus region has been the focus of understanding unconventional oil and gas development and groundwater quality, this is the first study of these areas to systematically determine the presence of benzene and methane in drinking water wells near unconventional oil and gas production areas in relation to the age of the groundwater. These two items can have various human health implications when present in high concentrations in drinking water.
The USGS has pioneered the ability to determine the age of groundwater. "Understanding the occurrence of methane and benzene in groundwater in the context of groundwater age is useful because it allows us to assess whether the hydrocarbons were from surface or subsurface sources. The ages indicate groundwater moves relatively slowly in these aquifers. Decades or longer may be needed to fully assess the effects of unconventional oil and gas production activities on the quality of groundwater used for drinking water," said Peter McMahon, USGS hydrologist and study lead.
In the study, 116 domestic and public-supply wells in the Fayetteville, Haynesville, and Eagle Ford shale plays located as close as 360 feet to unconventional oil and gas wells were sampled. Methane was detected in 91 percent of the wells and, of those, 90 percent had methane concentrations lower than the threshold of 10 milligrams per liter. This proposed threshold was determined by the Dept. of the Interior Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation and Enforcement as protection from explosive risk Most of the methane detected in groundwater was from naturally occurring microbial sources at shallow depths rather than deep shale gas.
Although benzene was detected in 8 percent of the wells sampled, concentrations were low--the highest concentration was nearly 40 times lower than the federal standard for benzene in drinking water of 5 micrograms per liter. Benzene was detected about 1.5 to 8 times more frequently in the study area groundwater than in national data sets of benzene in groundwater.
Groundwater in the Louisiana and Texas study areas typically entered the aquifers several thousand years ago. Nearly all the benzene detected in those areas occurred in old groundwater, indicating it was from subsurface sources such as natural hydrocarbon migration or leaking oil and gas wells. In Arkansas, groundwater was much younger--typically less than 40 years old. Benzene was detected in one sample of young groundwater in Arkansas that could be associated with a surface release associated with unconventional oil and gas production activities.
The article, "Methane and Benzene in Drinking-water Wells Overlying the Eagle Ford, Fayetteville, and Haynesville Shale Hydrocarbon Production Areas," is published online in the journal Environmental Science & Technology.