Nectarine Fruit Disorder - Nectarine Pox Prevention

In some years, growers report a higher incidence of nectarine pox than usual, and in many cases, cool spring temperatures and above-normal rainfall in June are prevailing factors.
Nectarine Fruit Disorder - Nectarine Pox Prevention - Articles

Updated: October 24, 2017

Nectarine Fruit Disorder - Nectarine Pox Prevention

The following is a review of what causes this physiological disorder and ways you can manage orchard conditions to reduce its occurrence.

Background on Nectarine Pox

USDA scientists Harold Fogle and Michael Faust (1975, 1976) conducted studies in the early 1970s that helped explain the morphology of superficial disorders of nectarines. They reported that nectarine growth does not follow the three-phase sigmoid curve typical of peaches and that occasionally the skin does not grow at the same rate as the flesh. Also, they studied fruit surfaces with scanning electron microscopy and suggested that clonal differences in surface conformation (ridging, stomatal cracking, stomatal suberization) may explain varying susceptibilities to skin disorders. The unprotected surface of nectarines makes them more susceptible than peaches to fruit blemishes. In addition to the lack of pubescence, nectarines have only a slight tendency to form flakes of wax, and there are no wax platelets such as those observed on Delicious apple.

Following a flare-up of nectarine pox in the 1980s, Penn State scientists Larry Hull and George Greene conducted studies on possible management strategies (personal communication, 1999). Hull caged limbs to isolate insect damage symptoms and found no insects associated with nectarine pox. Greene tested calcium treatments but found no effects on nectarine pox incidence.

Nectarine pox incidence is positively correlated to June rainfall and negatively correlated to crop load.

First Description of the Disorder

Nectarine pox was first described in the literature in 1991 (Auxt Baugher and Miller, 1991a). The disorder is characterized by superficial warty outgrowths and in some years may occur on 20 to 80 percent of the fruit in an orchard block. The symptoms at harvest are similar to beady wart (caused by aphid feeding) but in early stages are distinct eruptions of the epidermis rather than sunken depressions associated with insect feeding. Studies conducted in West Virginia (Auxt Baugher and Miller, 1991b) showed that nectarine pox incidence is positively correlated to June rainfall, terminal shoot length, and fruit flesh nitrogen level and that root pruning two weeks after full bloom reduces the disorder.

Research Conducted in Pennsylvania Orchards

Additional studies were conducted in Pennsylvania following a high incidence of nectarine pox in 1996. With the cooperation of four growers, we ruled out virus as a causal factor and corroborated the importance of managing tree vigor. Bill Howell (National Clean Plant Network, Washington State University, Prosser) and Ruth Welliver (Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture) screened symptomatic Firebrite and Summer Beaut nectarine trees for viruses and only Peach Latent Mosaic Viroid (PLMVd) was detected. PLMVd is widely distributed in "clean stock" and is latent in most situations.

Shoot length, leaf nutrient levels, fruit peel nutrient levels, crop load, soil pH, environmental conditions, and nectarine pox incidence were tracked in 11 orchard blocks over three years (Auxt Baugher, 1999). In Years 1 and 2, nectarine pox initially appeared after shuck fall and gradually increased through the season, with the most severe symptoms developing one to two weeks prior to harvest. In Year 3, some early nectarine pox symptoms appeared to be associated with shuck constriction, and new symptoms did not appear until final swell.

During each year of the study, nectarine pox incidence was positively correlated to percent leaf nitrogen, leaf potassium, and peel nitrogen. Two out of three years, nectarine pox was positively correlated to terminal shoot growth and percent peel potassium and magnesium. One out of three years, nectarine pox was positively correlated to percent leaf phosphorus and magnesium and percent peel phosphorus and negatively correlated to crop load, percent leaf boron and percent peel calcium. In the third year, an additional tissue nutritional analysis was conducted in May, and percent leaf boron was highly correlated with nectarine pox incidence.

Analyses conducted across the three years of data revealed an inverse correlation between nectarine pox, crop load, and average temperature in May and positive correlations between nectarine pox incidence and percent leaf nitrogen, percent peel nitrogen, and June rainfall. These data are consistent with the relationships reported in a five-year comparison conducted in West Virginia (Auxt Baugher and Miller, 1991a). Cool May temperatures inhibit uptake of boron and sometimes reduce crop load. June rainfall may cause growth spurts at a susceptible developmental stage.

Best Management Practices

Based on studies in Pennsylvania and West Virginia orchards, nectarine producers should:

  • Avoid practices that encourage excessive shoot growth (especially spurts of growth in late May/early June or before harvest)
  • Utilize management tools that encourage even growth over the season (such as regularly scheduled irrigation)
  • Maintain nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and magnesium at moderate levels, and
  • Maintain calcium and boron at optimum levels.

To assess most nutrient levels, leaves should be sampled in mid-July to mid-August, but boron is best assessed in May.

Research and grower observations indicate that nectarine pox is similar to cork spot on apples in that it is associated with any factor that contributes to an irregular rate of fruit growth. Conditions that appear to predispose trees to nectarine pox include high nitrogen (and other macronutrients), uneven moisture, and physical constriction. As with cork spot, it also is important to maintain optimum boron and calcium levels.

Special thanks to cooperating fruit producers: Ronald Slonaker, West Virginia, and Mark Rice, Jim Lott, Jim Lerew, Joe Lerew, John Lerew, and Doug Lott, Pennsylvania

Literature Cited

Auxt Baugher, T. and S. S. Miller. 1991a. Nectarine pox: a disorder of nectarine fruit. HortScience 26:310.

Auxt Baugher, T. and S. S. Miller. 1991b. Growth suppression as a control for nectarine pox. HortScience 26:1268-1270.

Auxt Baugher, T. 2000. Factors that influence the incidence of nectarine pox. 1999-2000 Research Progress Report prepared for Rice Fruit Company.

Fogle, H. W. and M. Faust. 1975. Ultrastructure of nectarine fruit surfaces. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 100:74-77.

Fogle, H. W. and M. Faust. 1976. Fruit growth and cracking in nectarines. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 101:434-439.