Articles

Managing Drought Stressed Corn

Drought can be common in PA. That does not mean it eases the stress when deciding to chop or leave corn for another day.
Updated:
October 11, 2023

Drought and its effects are often part of growing corn in Pennsylvania. Although we can do little to influence the weather, we can make management decisions that minimize the drought's impact on the crop's utilization. Fortunately, our livestock-based agriculture means we have many ways to salvage corn in our state. If you're faced with drought-stunted corn, consider some ideas below for managing this crop.

Assessing the Situation

The condition and yield potential of the crop should be monitored as the season progresses. This allows you to consider other harvesting options or meet feed needs well in advance. Usually, droughts in Pennsylvania are short-term, and the main effects are reduced grain and silage yields. In the most severe cases, drought stress can result in the need for an early salvage harvest for silage.

As the drought progresses, consider identifying ways to market your crop as silage since returns are often greater than harvesting for grain. Check with your Crop Insurance representative or FSA office before harvesting the crop. Livestock producers should assess winter feed inventories and explore opportunities for purchasing corn silage, western hay, or other forages.

Estimating Yield Potential of Drought-Stressed Corn

Yields will be variable depending on the timing and severity of the drought. Drought stress is most severe within two weeks before or after silking. A rough estimate of the potential grain yield can be obtained using the kernel count method (see "Estimating Corn Yields" below). An estimate of wet (70% moisture) silage yield is about 1 ton per foot of height of corn without ears or poorly pollinated ears. This estimate is often high when estimating very short corn, 1-3 feet tall.

For cornfields with no ear development that are losing leaves and not unrolling at night, the yield potential will likely be low, from 0-50 bushels/acre or so. For fields with a good stand and exhibiting leaf rolling only during the day, there may still be good yield potential if the drought is relieved by mid-August. Fields that experience drought well into August often will have lost a significant amount of their top-end yield potential, perhaps 50 bushels per acre or more, even if conditions would be perfect from then until the end of the season. Fields following soybeans or hay (not double-cropped) often will tolerate the drought much better than fields following corn.

Estimating Corn Yields

Count the number of kernel rows, kernels per row, and ears per acre to make an approximate preharvest estimate of corn yields. All measurements must be taken from representative ears and areas of the fields.

Start by counting the number of ears per acre. Count ears on plants for 17 feet 5 inches if planting on 30-inch rows. This distance represents 1/1000th of an acre. (If in a different row spacing, divide 43,560 by row spacing, in feet, then again by 1,000. This will give you 1/1000th of an acre distance.)

Pull three ears from random plants while counting the ears in your 1/1000th of an acre.

Now, count the kernels per row. This will be an average number of kernels in the rows that run long along the ear. Look at both ends and find a row representing the ear as an average row, Image 1. Do this for all three ears. After you have done this, snap the ear in half, as close to the middle as you can, and count the number of kernel rows. Tip: This will always be an even number.

Ear of corn. Get an average count the number of kernels per row
Image 1. Corn ear for grain. When counting kernels, look for a row that represents the average row length. Image from A. Hohn.
Ear of corn broke in half - count the number of kernel rows.
Image 2 - Break the ear in half to count kernel rows. Image from A. Hohn.

Now, multiply the kernel rows by the kernels per row and then by the ears per acre. Divide this number by 90,000 to get bushels/acre.

Repeat this process in several areas in the field to get a representative sample of the crop. The final yield will depend on conditions during grain fill- this estimate is for average-size kernels. Under continued drought stress through grain fill, this may overestimate yields.

Example

14 kernel rows x 25 kernels/ row x 25,000 ears/ acre = 8,750,000 kernels/ acre

8,750,000 kernels/ acre ÷ 90,000 kernels/ bu = 97 bu/ acre

Salvaging Drought-Stressed Corn for Silage

Corn can recover from drought stress, so delay a salvage harvest as long as possible. If the corn has tasseled, leaves cease to unroll at night, and the tops start to brown out, the plants will probably not recover. As the browning of the crop continues, the forage quality will decline as the plants use stored carbohydrates in the leaves and stalk to sustain themselves. If half the leaves were dead or dying, they would be a good candidate for evaluation for silage harvest. At this point, you should probably consider harvesting it for silage. Delaying harvest will reduce yield, quality, and the potential to plant a second crop.

Moisture testing is essential in these situations because corn is often wetter than it appears. If the forage is extremely wet (greater than 75-80%), harvest should likely be delayed since this will result in seepage and a loss in silage quality. Excessively wet silage like this has caused silos to collapse in some situations. Avoid chopping when the moisture is below 60-63%. If a drought-ending rain occurs just before a planned salvage harvest, the moisture content of drought-stressed, immature corn will increase, so harvest should be delayed in this situation.

Potential Silage Quality

Drought-stunted corn will likely be higher in protein and some minerals than normal silage and lower in energy. The fiber levels are often higher in silage with less grain content, but the digestibility of that fiber is often higher. An example of forage quality from six drought-stunted, 6–7-foot-tall corn crops salvaged in mid-August is shown in Table 1. Note the elevated crude protein, NDF, nitrate, Ca, and K levels compared to normal corn silage. Forage quality differences are less if drought-stunted corn develops some grain and is harvested near normal maturity. Without grain, starch concentrations will be very low.

When drought-stunted corn is allowed to reach maturity and has some grain formation, forage quality will also be impacted. Table 2 shows forage quality values for the same hybrid produced on the same farm in 1998 (normal rainfall) and 1999 (drought). The drought-stunted corn was about 6 feet tall with 6-inch-long ears. Note that crude protein, NDF, Ca, and K levels are also elevated in the drought year, but not to the degree that occurred in the immature corn in Table 1. Notice that the lignin levels are also reduced in the drought-stunted corn and that the digestibility is similar for the two years despite the reduced starch in the 1999 crop. The drought-stunted crop also had moderate damage from European corn borer in the ears and some evidence of ear molds.

When feeding drought-stressed corn silage, be sure to get a forage test to have rations adjusted effectively. Drought-stunted, low-grain corn silage also tends to be less dense- as a result, truck and silo capacities are often lower. Because of the lower grain content, drought-stressed corn will be less responsive to kernel processing.

Table 1. Forage analyses of drought-stunted corn obtained in Lancaster County in 1999.
Farm CP
%
NDF
%
NEL
Mcal/lb
Ca
%
P
%
Mg
%
K
%
Nitrate-N
ppm
1 9.1 56.8 0.62 0.44 0.22 0.13 1.34 1053
2 9.6 53.3 0.63 0.31 0.23 0.13 1.59 1263
3 11.3 53.3 0.67 0.44 0.27 0.12 1.40 947
4 10.1 50.1 0.66 0.21 0.26 0.12 2.04 1474
5 10.7 52.0 0.66 0.38 0.25 0.12 1.99 1684
6 8.4 49.6 0.70 0.27 0.22 0.12 1.06 737
Normal 8.1 45.0 0.73 0.28 0.26 0.17 1.20
Table 2. Forage analyses from the same hybrid grown in a normal year (1998) and a drought year (1999) in Lebanon County.
Year CP
%
NDF
%
IVDMD
%
Ca
%
P
%
Mg
%
K
%
Lignin
%
Starch
%
1999 8.4 41.1 74.5 0.29 0.27 0.26 1.65 1.8 32.9
1998 7.8 38.3 74.9 0.18 0.30 0.20 1.10 2.0 39.5

Nitrate Concerns

Elevated nitrate concentrations are common in drought-stressed corn crops. The potential is greatest for high nitrate levels in young plants, especially in the stalks and heavily manured fields. Elevated nitrate levels are common in Pennsylvania, but only occasionally at toxic levels. The potential is generally greatest for 3-4 days following a drought-ending rain, but it can be a problem anytime.

Leaving a 12-inch stubble in the field can reduce nitrates, but this would also reduce yields and may not be desirable unless a forage test confirms the presence of high levels of nitrates. Because the nitrate potential can be reduced through ensiling, grazing, and green chopping, drought-stressed corn is an undesirable harvesting alternative. Even though nitrates are a concern, experience from testing and feeding past drought-stricken crops indicates that excessive nitrate levels (>1700 ppm NO³-N) are not that common and that with good management, most nitrate-related problems can be avoided with careful feeding management.

High nitrates can contribute to animal feed problems and deadly silo gas. Be especially cautious when filling silos with these suspect crops. Silo gas is produced during the first 4-5 days after silo filling when nitrates are converted to oxides of N (NO, NO2, and N2O4). Of these, NO2, or nitrogen dioxide, is the most common yellow-orange gas with a bleach-like odor. This gas is heavier than air and can form in the silo and then escape down the unloading chute into the barn, endangering both humans and cattle. Exposure to silo gas can cause immediate death or severe lung injury due to the formation of nitric acid in the lungs. To avoid exposure to silo gases, keep the door between the feed room and the barn closed, ventilate the silo by running the blower for at least 20 minutes before entering the silo, and learn to recognize the bleach-like odor and yellow-orange color as signals of silo gas.

If you believe your corn may contain high nitrate levels, forage analysis for nitrates should be part of your mitigation plan. Since nitrate levels will reduce through the ensilage and storing process, and at feed samples should also be tested, Harvest Corn Silage Nitrate Test is also useful for nitrate management. 

Pricing Silage

Often, the price is influenced by local supply and demand. The Extension Dairy Team at Penn State maintains a spreadsheet with current estimates of feed and forage prices.

Values of drought-stunted corn will vary, but in one recent scenario of prices, drought-stunted corn with few ears was worth about 91% of normal silage, while drought-stunted corn with no ears was worth only 66% of normal corn silage. When pricing corn silage, be sure to consider harvesting and hauling costs as well as the moisture content of the silage.

Read From Harvest to Feed: Understanding Silage Management for more information. 

Ear Molds

Hot, dry conditions associated with drought years are generally not considered conducive to the growth of typical Fusarium molds that are common in Pennsylvania. Still, if European corn borer damage to the ear is significant, Fusarium molds can develop. Fusarium molds often appear as white or pink molds on the ear and are responsible for most of the mycotoxins we encounter in Pennsylvania. However, the mold does not indicate that mycotoxins will be present. The only sure way to determine if mycotoxins are present is through testing. Many forage testing laboratories can run a mycotoxin assay. Mycotoxin analyses are usually warranted only if a problem is suspected.

Hot, dry conditions are conducive to the development of Aspergillus fungi, which are sometimes reported in Pennsylvania. Some species of Aspergillus can result in aflatoxin. The Aspergillus fungus is a greenish-yellow mold that appears on the ear.

Common Smut is another common fungus that frequently appears during drought. Smut produces large gray smut galls on the ears, tassels, or at the nodes. Smut does not produce mycotoxin, so smut-contaminated feed is generally considered safe to feed.

If you are suspicious or believe you may have ear rots, Corn Ear Rots and Mycotoxins has many more resources and images of fungal infections.

Standability

Frequently, drought-stressed grain crops will have lower-than-average resistance to stalk rots. This result is because the plant uses carbohydrate reserves from the stalk to fill the grain during periods of late-season stress. It may pay to scout fields during the early fall to determine if any are at risk for stalk lodging problems. Typical symptoms will include some broken stalks and light and hollow stalks with pink coloration on the inside of the stalk or some discoloration at the nodes inside the stalk. Fields with these symptoms would be good candidates for early harvest.

Scouting for Stalk Rots in Corn by Dr. Paul Esker provides information and is a fantastic resource for anyone seeking more information.

Economics of Harvesting

Usually, it is still worthwhile to harvest drought-stricken corn, but in some of the most drought-stressed fields, it may be a toss-up. The variable costs, such as fuel, labor, and repairs, associated with chopping a light corn crop are in the $15 to $25/acre range, so if producers can harvest at least one ton of silage per acre valued at perhaps $20/ton, they will break even. Achieving this yield may require corn that is about two feet tall.

To get a better idea of silage prices, complete the Spreadsheet to Price Standing Corn for Silage. This form will account for all inputs associated with planting through harvest and help determine your breakeven price.

Replanting Options Following Corn

This will depend on the herbicide program used for corn. Generally, sorghum-sudan grass may be the most viable option if planting can be achieved by early August. Small grains, annual ryegrass, or soybeans are also alternatives in some situations, but dry weather may make atrazine carryover high, which will damage the more sensitive crops like oats and soybeans. Of the small grains, rye has the most tolerance to atrazine. Spring grains, such as oats, can provide fall growth, but oats are the most sensitive to atrazine. Check herbicide labels for replanting restrictions. For example, small grain crops are not registered to be cropped until the year after application of atrazine. If cornfields are unsatisfactory for planting fall forage crops, small-grain stubble fields could be used to establish a fall small-grain or annual ryegrass emergency forage crop. For the highest fall forage yields, consider using a spring grain in this situation.

Annual grasses, like millets and Italian ryegrass, can be planted later in summer or early fall and ready for harvest in as little as 45 days. Species like this can be options if the operation needs forage.

Planning for the Future

Drought stress on corn is common in Pennsylvania, although it varies from farm to farm depending on rainfall and the soil water-holding capacity. Generally, shallow or shaly soils are most prone to risk from droughts over the long term. In situations where drought stress is common, it is often wise to consider whether growing any corn is a good idea. Often, other crops may be more profitable than corn grown for grain. One solution is to reduce the amount of corn in the rotation and substitute soybeans or barley in the rotation. This provides some diversity in crops that can tolerate stress better, resulting in corn that can tolerate stress better because it is grown in a rotation. We know that corn following corn often fares poorly in a drought. A second strategy might be only to grow corn for silage and purchase the corn grain needed on the farm. A third strategy might be to increase the amount of storage for corn silage on the farm to help cover lower yields during drought. Another strategy might be using crop insurance to cover losses during the occasional drought year.