News

Freeze Damage in Peaches and Apples and Other Fruit

This article summarizes damage to fruit in regions of Pennsylvania hit by the freeze event on April 7th, 2025. Growers should be aware of damage in their own orchards when designing their thinning program.
Updated:
April 15, 2025

Introduction

Last Wednesday morning (April 7th, 2025), temperatures across the region dropped significantly, with observed lows ranging from 15 ℉ to 25 ℉. These temperatures were at least a few degrees lower than what had been forecasted.

At the time of the freeze, peaches were in various stages of bloom, ranging from first bloom to full bloom, depending on the variety and location. As expected, varieties that were in full bloom experienced substantial to severe damage due to the cold. In contrast, varieties that were slightly behind in development, still in early bloom or pre-bloom stages—suffered noticeably less damage.

This report is divided into sections by region, and includes some information on crops other than apples and peaches/nectarines: pear, cherry, and apricot. Tables summarizing observed damage precede discussions of the findings and recommendations for consideration.

Southcentral Region: Adams County

Southern Adams County

Table 1: Peach Bud Mortality in Adams County
Variety # Branches Total Buds Damaged Buds Damage %
Avalonâ„¢ 3 55 38 69
Blushingstar® 3 48 10 21
Coralstar® 3 16 5 31
Cresthaven 3 42 2 5
Desiree® 3 52 2 4
Glengloâ„¢ 3 46 4 9
John Boy® 3 26 4 15
Messina® 3 33 25 76
PF5D- Big 3 [p 3 5
Redgold Nectarine 3 36 34 94
Sentry 3 44 2 5
Silvergloâ„¢ 3 40 20 50
SilverGem® 3 33 31 94
Starfire® 3 41 3 7
Victoria® 3 20 17 85

Despite this event, most peach varieties are expected to carry a crop, though heavily damaged varieties may see significant losses. Before making thinning decisions or applying chemical thinners like Accede™, it is essential to assess the extent of bud survival. Be sure to evaluate at least 50–100 buds per variety to get a reliable estimate of damage.

Once the level of injury is known, you can tailor your thinning approach accordingly. Accede™ can be a useful tool, but its application rate should be adjusted based on bloom density and freeze damage severity. The labeled rate is 300–600 ppm, equivalent to 10–20 ounces of soluble granule product per 100 gallons of water per acre. A general starting point is 15 oz (450 ppm) per 100 gallons/acre. However, reduce the rate for lightly blooming trees, young trees, sensitive varieties, or those with visible frost damage, to avoid over-thinning.

Table 2: Pear Bud Mortality in Southern Adams County at the Penn State Fruit Research and Extension Center (FREC)
Variety # Branches Total Buds Damaged Buds Damage %
Harrow Sweet 4 95 80 84

The percentage bud damage indicate that no thinning may be necessary.  Local assessments of pear blocks should be conducted to determine if thinning is warranted, and that with care.

Table 3: Apple Bud Mortality in Southern Adams County
Variety # Branches Total Buds Damaged Buds Damage %
Gala (lower branch) 3 63 43 68
Gala (middle branch) 3 59 45 77
Gala (higher branch) 3 83 49 59
Gala Total 9 205 137 67

In southern Adams County, some cultivars were at the very early pink to late tight cluster stage during the freeze, and several blocks experienced extensive damage. In one Gala block, we observed approximately 60–70% bud damage, indicating that very little to no thinning will be necessary. In fact, blossom thinning is not recommended for this block. Depending on the final fruit set, a light fruitlet thinning spray may be sufficient later in the season. Buds/flowers evaluated from three different branch heights—high (H), medium (M), and low (L) within the canopy

Central Adams County

Table 4: Apple Bud Damage in Central Adams County
Variety # Branches Total Buds Damaged Buds Damage %
Honeycrisp (lower branch) 3 63 6 10
Honeycrisp (middle branch) 3 64 22 34
Honeycrisp (higher branch) 3 75 4 5
Honeycrisp Total 9 202 32 16
Fuji 3 20 4 20

For Honeycrisp and other apple cultivars such as Gala and Fuji in central Adams County, any buds that had begun to show pink—particularly king blooms and some terminal laterals—exhibited damage following the freeze event.

Damage to the reproductive organs is obvious when the bud is bisected with a sharp knife.  The following are Honeycrisp apple buds exhibiting dead pistils.  The collection of five buds on the right shows damage to the king blossom but no apparent damage to the laterals.

The image dipicts seven apple buds bisected longitudinally from pedicel through the center of the stigma.  The two on the left reveal brown, dead ovaries. The collection on the right represent a single cluster of five blossoms. In these only the king blossom has obvious signs of damage, with the remaining four having been potentially capable of producing fully formed fruit.
Figure 1: Seven buds of Honeycrisp collected in Adams County. The two on the left are king blossoms with the dead, brown-colored ovary prominently visible. The collection on the right were collected from a single cluster.  The king blossom exhibits clear signs of bud mortality, with the laterals potentially capable of setting fruit.  Photo by Dr. Shan Kumar, Penn State University.

Southeastern Region: Delaware County

Table 5: Bud Damage for a Variety of Fruit Crops in Delaware County
Fruit Crop Variety Stage # of dead flowers # of live flowers survival %
Nectarine Redgold Full Bloom 10 40 80%
Apple Red Delicious Late Pink 9 41 82%
Pink Ladyâ„¢ Late Pink 0 50 100%
Apricot Full Bloom 23 2 8%
Pear Crispieâ„¢ Full Bloom 2 23 92%
Plum Full Bloom 8 17 68%
Peach Galaxy Full Bloom 10 15 60%
Avalonâ„¢ Full Bloom 2 23 92%

At this particular site, frost protection measures such as orchard heating (burning fires) were implemented during the recent freeze event, and these efforts appear to have been largely successful in preventing severe damage, especially in peaches, nectarines, and apples. Most of the stone fruit varieties—including peaches, plums, and some pears—were in full bloom at the time of the freeze, a stage particularly vulnerable to low temperatures. Despite this, the survival data indicates that the heating strategy helped mitigate the cold’s impact across much of the orchard.

Fires were lit in Linvilla Orchards\' peach blocks in an attempt to reduce damage from the freeze.  The effort was largely successful.  The photo was taken at night, with the fires lighting up the orchard.
Figure 2: Fires set in a peach block to raise ground temperatures. Photo courtesy Norm Schultz, Linvilla Orchards.

For example, Redgold nectarines in a low-lying section still had an impressive 80% flower survival, and apples such as Red Delicious and Pink Ladyâ„¢ in the late pink stage maintained 82% and 100% survival, respectively. Pears and peaches also performed well, with the Crispieâ„¢ pear and Avalonâ„¢ peach showing 92% survival each. Galaxy peach and plums had moderate levels of damage, with 60% and 68% survival, respectively. The only variety that exhibited significant injury was apricot, which was in full bloom and showed just 8% survival, highlighting its sensitivity to freeze conditions.

Four blossoms are shown in pairs: two pear blossoms and two plum blossoms. The left blossom of each pair is healthy and would have produced a viable piece of fruit all other things being equal. The right blossom of each pair is damaged. The pear has a brown style while the plum\'s pistils have completely degraded into an watery, orange mass.
Figure 3: Healthy and damage pear and plum blossoms. Photos by Devansh Gupta, Penn State University.
Depicted are blossoms from two peach cultivars (Galaxy, Avalonâ„¢) and an unknown apricot cultivar. All three are damaged. The peach blossoms have a watery appearance and orange coloration. The apricot bud has shriveled stamens and pistils.
Figure 4: Damaged peach and apricot blossoms. Photos by Devansh Gupta, Penn State University.

Central Region: Bedford County

Table 6 below summarizes freeze damage assessments conducted across several peach and apple varieties, with buds evaluated from three different branch heights—high (H), medium (M), and low (L) within the canopy.

Table 6: Bud Damage Observed by Branch Location in Bedford County.
Variety H/M/L # of Buds Alive Dead Mortality
V-Block Peaches H 19 18 1 5%
M 33 31 2 3%
L 18 14 4 29%
Total: 70 63 7 10%
Glengloâ„¢ H 26 25 1 3%
M 31 27 4 13%
L 10 6 4 40%
Total: 67 58 9 13%
Glohaven H 25 24 1 4%
M 25 24 1 4%
L 25 23 2 8%
Total: 75 71 4 5%
Early Redhaven H 25 23 2 8%
M 25 23 2 8%
L 25 25 0 0%
Total: 75 71 4 5%
Cherry #1 (first white stage) H 15 2 13 87%
M 23 8 15 65%
L 19 14 5 36%
Total: 57 24 33 58%
Cherry #2 (first white stage) Total: 50 0 50 100%
Royal Red Honeycrisp® (frost prone site) H 24 18 6 25%
M 25 7 18 72%
L 24 10 14 58%
Total: 73 35 38 52%
Ultima Gala® (elevated site) H 25 20 5 20%
M 25 19 6 24%
L 25 24 1 4%
Total: 75 63 12 16%

The Bedford site utilized wind machines and a Frost Dragon for many of its stone fruit acreage as part of its frost protection strategy. The results show clear variation in bud mortality depending on both variety and bud position in the tree.

In the V-Block Peaches, overall bud mortality was relatively low at 10%, though the lower canopy showed higher damage (29%), suggesting that buds closer to the ground were more exposed to colder air during the freeze. Glengloâ„¢ exhibited moderate overall damage at 13.4%, with the greatest loss (40%) again observed in the low canopy. Glohaven and Early Redhaven showed strong bud survival, with minimal overall damage (both at 5.3%), indicating good freeze tolerance or protection across canopy levels.

In contrast, cherries were highly susceptible at the time of the freeze. Cherries which were in the first white stage had significant losses ranging from 50-100% depending on the variety and location.

Royal Red Honeycrisp®, located at a known frost-prone site, suffered significant losses with an overall mortality of 52%; the mid-canopy buds were most affected, with 72% mortality. Ultima Gala®, on an elevated site, had better outcomes with only 16% overall bud loss, and notably low damage (4%) in the lower canopy, possibly due to better air drainage or temperature moderation at that location. These findings underscore how cold air settling during freeze events can disproportionately affect buds in the lower and mid-canopy and highlight the need for canopy-level observations when assessing freeze damage and planning subsequent thinning or crop load management strategies.

Central Region: Centre County

The chart depicts the temperature fluctuations observed at the Rock Springs weather stations versus those predicted by the National Weather Service via NEWA. Temperatures dipped below 20 degrees farenheit at 7:00 a.m., five degrees lower than predicted. Between the hours of 2:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., the actual temperatures were below the predicted temperatures, though usually by less than two degress. After 5:00 p.m., temperatures rose above predicted to a high of approximately 48 degress.

At Rock Springs, temperatures dropped to 19 ℉ for several hours, followed by a more severe dip to 17 ℉ for approximately one hour. This prolonged exposure to sub-freezing conditions resulted in notable freeze damage across several apple varieties, particularly in low-lying, cold-prone areas of the orchard. While some blocks showed relatively high bud survival, others experienced significant losses, highlighting the microclimatic variability within the site.

Table 7 below summarizes bud survival percentages for key varieties across different blocks. In Block C, a known cold pocket, survival rates were dramatically lower. Fuji dropped to 12%, Pink Ladyâ„¢ to 38%, and Honeycrisp to 63%, indicating severe freeze injury in this part of the orchard.

Table 7: Apple and one peach (Redhaven) bud damage with block information in the Rock Springs trial blocks.
Variety Block %Survival
Crimson Crisp A3 64%
Fuji A1 86%
C 12%
Gala A1 89%
A3 48%
Gold Rush A3 85%
Golden Delicious A3 22%
Honeycrisp A1 88%
A3 43%
C 63%
Pink Ladyâ„¢ C 38%
Redhaven A1 94%
Part-Time Research Support
More By Melanie Schupp
James Schupp, Ph.D.
Former Professor of Pomology
Pennsylvania State University
Michael Rocinante Evans
Graduate Research Assistant
College of Agricultural Sciences
mre5314@psu.edu
Devansh Gupta
Graduate Research Assistant
College of Agricultural Sciences
dxg5585@psu.edu