News

2026 Pennsylvania Tree Fruit Maturity Report - September 28

The Tree Fruit Maturity Report is a weekly program to inform producers about the maturity of the most common apple cultivars sampled from two regions represented by two Pennsylvania counties: Adams and Berks.
Updated:
September 29, 2026

Introduction

Welcome to Penn State Extension's weekly apple maturity reports. Maturity metrics for key varieties will be tracked across the state throughout the 2026 season.

In this stressful year, with crops decimated by multiple springtime freeze events and hot, dry early summer weather, informed harvest timing recommendations are critical for fruit quality, particularly for apples in mid- to long-term storage. Balancing harvest decisions against sugar accumulation, color development, starch clearing, and firmness drop is difficult to perform in a normal year. These reports serve to provide insight and help inform management decisions.

Out of respect for our collaborators' need to squeeze out as much profit as possible from their available fruit, sampling of varieties may occur a week or more later than in previous years in order to reduce Penn State Extension's impact on their harvest. Please bear this in mind as recommendations this year may require quick action.

[Editor's note: The wrong template was used to create the Introduction section and has been corrected. Some clarifying text was added in the section on seedlessness in Braeburn. Extension regrets these errors.]

Observations

Seedlessness (Take 3)

Readers from last week will recall an observation made about Braeburn (Kumeu Crimson®) in Adams County: seedlessness across all samples.  Once again, every Braeburn tested failed to yield a single seed (Figure 1).  The score at the bottom of the second (round of sampling) stands at: seedless: 22, seeded: 0.

The image depicts ten Braeburn (Kumeu Crimson®) apples cut open to reveal the carpels in the core. Both the top and bottom halves of the fruit are in the image to reveal that neither half of the cut carpels contain seeds.
Figure 1. The ten apple samples used in this week's report. None of the fruit contained seeds, and there was significant variation in color and presence of callus in the cores. The rows are in pairs, with the top half being above and to the "northwest" of the bottom half of the apple.  Photo by Daniel E. Weber, Penn State.

This suggests that this condition is a widespread issue this year for this particular variety and strain.  (Or to qualify it further as an academic: at least in this particular block, and perhaps just in the area near one end of the rows where they were harvested).  Spot checking throughout the block may be conducted later this week—time permitting, with owner permission, and the block remaining unharvested.

A closer inspection of undifferentiated callus in the carpels can be seen in Figure 2.  The exception is the fourth image on the right, where the carpels have turned black and what appears to be fungal mycelia have taken hold.  While this has not been verified in a laboratory, it is quite possible that this is the onset of an Alternaria infection leading to dry core rot.  Breaking open another sample not included with those used for this report reveals what appears to be a clear path to infection with a somewhat open "sinus" as seen in Golden Delicious or Idared (Figure 3).

The image displays four examples of Braeburn carpels from four different apples.  Each image appears to be clean and healthy, with white lumpy callus present.  The fourth image on the right is possibly an example of core rot: the core is black and there are white tufts that look like mycelia present.
Figure 2. Examples of the carpels in Braeburn.  The image on the right may display evidence of core rot, with the white patch not composed of callus but fungal mycelia. Inspection under a microscope or laboratory analyses would be necessary to verify this. Photo by Daniel E. Weber, Penn State.
The image depicts two Braeburn apples.  The one on top has been cut in half vertically, from stem to calyx end. The second is broken open by twisting.  Both reveal a seedless core.  The top one is white, and exhibits callus.  The bottom one has turned black and appears to be affected by dry core rot.
Figure 3. Additional examples of Braeburn cores. The carpels in the top image are filled with callus, while those in the bottom have what appears to be dry core rot (an Alternaria spp. infection). Photo by Daniel E. Weber, Penn State.

Adams County

Discussion

Fall has arrived in the orchard. Last week brought a lot of rain (~1.5 inches) and a clear shift to cooler conditions, with daytime highs mostly in the 60s and nighttime temperatures frequently dropping into the 40s and 50s. Temperatures have moderated slightly over the past few days, and somewhat warmer conditions are expected later this week. Despite this, overall temperatures should remain typical of early fall. Some rainfall is also expected this week, especially later in the week towards the weekend.

Varietal Analysis

Table 1. Fruit quality parameters of selected apple cultivars collected in Adams County. Rows in bold indicate most recent data. Historical values are retained for reference for those in northern regions of the state.
Date Mass
(g)
Diameter
(in)
Red Color
(%)
Background
(1-5)
Firmness
(lb)
Soluble Solids
(°Bx)
Starch Index
(1-8)
Braeburn (Kumeu Crimson®)
9/28 261.6 3.2 76.4 1.2 22.8 13.5 3.9
9/21 245.2 3.2 78.0 1.2 22.8 13.7 3.2
Evercrisp®
9/28 271.0 3.3 53.0 1.4 20.4 13.6 4.1
9/21 266.7 3.3 40.0 1.5 20.1 13.2 2.9
Fuji (Aztec® / DT2 cv.)
9/28 227.3 3.1 80.4 1.3 15.6 12.0 5.4
9/21 263.5 3.3 65.0 1.2 16.5 12.0 4.5
9/14 230.2 3.2 67.8 1.7 16.3 11.0 3.1
Granny Smith
9/28 302.9 3.6 6.1 1.9 17.7 11.1 3.2
9/21 289.2 3.4 8.1 2.9 18.1 11.7 2.3
Nittany
9/28 288.2 3.4 57.4 1.5 18.2 11.7 2.4
9/21 264.2 3.3 36.3 1.5 18.8 11.2 2.1
9/14 249.9 3.3 49.0 1.5 20.3 10.8 2.0

Braeburn (Kumeu Crimson®) (Figure 4) is holding steady in firmness at 22.8 lb, the highest of the group. Red color remained at 76%, while background color was unchanged at 1.2. Brix also remained steady at approximately 13.5. Starch increased from 3.2 to 4.0, and fruit weight increased from 245 to 262 g. If this variety is destined for long term storage, it should be harvested this week, otherwise, it can wait until next week to be harvested.

Evercrisp® (Figure 4) is continuing to move in the right direction. Red color increased from 40% to 53%, starch increased from 2.9 to 4.1, and Brix rose from 13.2 to 13.6. Background color was essentially unchanged at 1.4, and firmness held at approximately 20 lb. For short-term storage, harvest can wait until next week to allow additional color development, as Evercrisp® stores well. Otherwise, it can be harvested this week.

Fuji (Aztec® / DT2 cv.) (Figure 5) is the most advanced block sampled this week. Starch increased from 4.5 to 5.4, and red color increased from 65% to 80%. Background color edged up from 1.2 to 1.3. Firmness dropped from 16.5 to 15.6 lb, the lowest in the group, while Brix remained unchanged at 12.0. As Fuji continues to advance toward overmaturity, fruit can become more susceptible to cracking, so it should be harvested quickly this week.

Granny Smith (Figure 6) is still relatively early based on starch, which increased from 2.3 to 3.2. Firmness eased from 18.1 to 17.7 lb, while Brix dropped from 11.7 to 11.1. Blush remained minimal at 6%. Background color decreased from 2.9 to 1.9, the largest change in background color among the varieties this week. Fruit weight is the largest of the group at 303 g. Harvest this week if the fruit is destined for long-term storage. For short-term storage, harvest can wait until next week or the following week.

Nittany (Figure 5) continued to mature slowly. Red color improved from 36% to 57%, and Brix increased from 11.2 to 11.7. Starch changed only slightly, from 2.1 to 2.4, while background color remained at 1.5. Firmness slipped from 18.8 to 18.2 lb. Continue monitoring over the next few weeks.

The image depicts two sets of apples each: Braeburn (Kumeu Crimson®) on the left and Evercrisp® on the right. Each set of ten fruit is viewed from three different angles and cut open and stained for starch-iodine testing. The four views are: (top) a top-down view of the fruit (looking down into the stem cavity); (top-middle) a view of one side of the fruit so the coloration of the skin becomes more apparent; (top-bottom) a view of the opposite side of the fruit to reveal the background color; and, (bottom) a top-down view of the fruit cut in half across the equator and stained with a type of Lugol\'s solution for starch-iodine indexing. The order of the fruit is consistent in each of the four variety views so one may compare the appearance of the fruit and correlated that with the starch-iodine index. For an interpretation of the foreground, background, and starch index see the accompanying report.
Figure 4. Braeburn (Kumeu Crimson®) (L) and Evercrisp® (R). Side views for "front" and "back" were collected to provide a more complete picture of coloration. Collected in Adams County. Photo by Daniel E. Weber, Penn State.
The image depicts two sets of apples each: Fuji (Aztec® / DT2 cv.) on the left and Nittany on the right. Each set of ten fruit is viewed from three different angles and cut open and stained for starch-iodine testing. The four views are: (top) a top-down view of the fruit (looking down into the stem cavity); (top-middle) a view of one side of the fruit so the coloration of the skin becomes more apparent; (top-bottom) a view of the opposite side of the fruit to reveal the background color; and, (bottom) a top-down view of the fruit cut in half across the equator and stained with a type of Lugol\'s solution for starch-iodine indexing. The order of the fruit is consistent in each of the four variety views so one may compare the appearance of the fruit and correlated that with the starch-iodine index. For an interpretation of the foreground, background, and starch index see the accompanying report.
Figure 5. Fuji (Aztec® / DT2 cv.) (L) and Nittany (R). Side views for "front" and "back" were collected to provide a more complete picture of coloration. Collected in Adams County. Photo by Daniel E. Weber, Penn State.
The image depicts a single set of ten apples of the variety Granny Smith.  As with other figures used in the maturity reports, each set of ten fruit is viewed from three different angles and cut open and stained for starch-iodine testing.  The four views are: (left) a top-down view of the fruit (looking down into the stem cavity); (left-middle) a view of one side of the fruit so the coloration of the skin becomes more apparent; (right-middle) a view of the opposite side of the fruit to reveal the background color; and, (right) a top-down view of the fruit cut in half across the equator and stained with a type of Lugol\'s solution for starch-iodine indexing. The order of the fruit is consistent in each of the four variety views so one may compare the appearance of the fruit and correlated that with the starch-iodine index. For an interpretation of the foreground, background, and starch index see the accompanying report.
Figure 6. Granny Smith. Side views for "front" and "back" were collected to provide a more complete picture of coloration. Collected in Adams County. Photo by Daniel E. Weber, Penn State.

Berks County

Varietal Analysis

Table 2. Fruit quality parameters of selected apple cultivars collected in Berks County. Rows in bold indicate most recent data. Historical values are retained for reference for those in northern regions of the state.
Date Mass
(g)
Diameter
(in)
Red Color
(%)
Background
(1-5)
Firmness
(lb)
Soluble Solids
(°Bx)
Starch Index
(1-8)
Evercrisp®
9/28 151.6 2.5 60.5 1.7 19.3 15.4 2.4
9/21 210.9 2.4 53.5 2.8 21.1 16.01 1.7
9/14 186.5 2.4 46.0 3.6 22.4 15.1 1.4

Evercrisp® (Figure 7) in Berks County showed slower starch development than the Adams County block, with starch increasing from 1.7 to 2.4. Red color improved from 53.5% to 60.5%. Background color decreased from 2.8 to 1.7, while firmness eased from 21.1 to 19.3 lb. Brix was the highest of any block in this report at 15.4. There was some variation in fruit size and diameter in this week’s samples compared with last week. Continue monitoring over the next few weeks.

The image depicts ten Evercrisp® apples, viewed from two different angles and cut open and stained for starch-iodine testing. The three views are: (left) a top-down view of the fruit (looking down into the stem cavity); (middle) a view of one side of the fruit so the coloration of the skin becomes more apparent; and, (right) a top-down view of the fruit cut in half across the equator and stained with a type of Lugol\'s solution for starch-iodine indexing. The order of the fruit is consistent in each of the three views so one may compare the appearance of the fruit and correlated that with the starch-iodine index. For an interpretation of the foreground, background, and starch index see the accompanying report.
Figure 7. Evercrisp® apples collected in Berks County. Photo by Don Seifrit, Penn State.

Historical Data

The tables below contain the data collected in previous weeks of this year's reporting cycle. It is provided to provide information to growers who may be in regions where these varieties are still developing and to serve as a historical record of the 2026 growing season. Please review the previous weeks' reports for information on harvesting.

Adams County

Table 3. Fruit quality parameters of selected apple cultivars collected in Adams County. Historical values are retained for reference for those in northern regions of the state.
Date Mass
(g)
Diameter
(in)
Red Color
(%)
Background
(1-5)
Firmness
(lb)
Soluble Solids
(°Bx)
Starch Index
(1-8)
Autumn Crisp (NY674 cv.)
8/17 288.4 3.6 26 1.5 17.4 12.6 5.1
8/10 221.1 3.3 21 2.1 17.0 12.0 3.4
Crown™ Empire
9/8 135.5 2.7 97.2 1.1 21.5 13.5 4.0
CrimsonCrisp®
9/14 222.6 3.2 96.3 1.2 21.0 14.1 6.2
Fuji (Daybreak™ / Rankin cv.)
8/24 244.0 3.3 81.9 1.3 17.6 13.7 4.6
Fuji (September Wonder®)
8/24 298.0 3.5 48.5 1.7 15.8 11.9 4.6
FyreFly®
9/14 223.3 3.2 28.5 1.5 15.0 14.1 6.5
8/31 210.1 3.1 13.2 1.5 18.2 12.5 4.4
Gala (Buckeye®)
8/24 188.0 2.9 90.9 1.2 21.2 11.5 4.9
8/17 160.4 2.7 72.0 1.1 22.5 10.2 4.1
8/10 157.2 2.7 72.0 1.1 25.4 10.7 2.7
8/3 147.2 2.7 42.0 1.5 26.5 9.9 3.0
Gala (Wildfire™)
7/27 174 2.9 97 1.1 21.4 12.9 5.2
Golden Delicious
9/8 236.3 3.3 1.9 1.4 17.9 12.5 3.4
8/31 220.6 3.1 0.6 1.6 18.0 11.0 2.4
Honeycrisp (Original Strain)
8/17 328.7 3.7 47 1.6 17.7 13.2 4.7
8/10 302.8 3.6 6 1.8 22.0 11.5 2.2
8/3 219.3 3.2 15 2.4 21.5 11.5 2.0
Honeycrisp (Premier®)
8/10 322.5 3.6 23 1.3 17.4 12.3 6.6
8/3 249.2 3.4 7 1.5 20.9 11.7 4.8
7/27 226 3.2 11 1.8 19.6 11.6 1.7
Honeycrisp (Royal Red® / PP #22,244)
8/17 307.2 3.6 58 1.5 20.1 12.6 3.3
Jonaprince (Wilton’s® Red / Red Jonathan cv.)
9/8 412.1 3.9 53.0 2.1 15.2 12.6 4.0
8/31 264.7 3.4 72.9 1.4 18.0 13.0 2.9
Jonathan
8/24 198.0 3.2 86.0 2.7 17.2 10.9 5.9
Red Delicious (Super Chief®) / Sandidge cv.
9/14 239.6 3.4 93.7 1.1 16.6 12.3 4.6
9/8 255.8 3.4 90.3 1.1 16.0 11.1 3.3
8/31 284.3 3.5 96.6 1.4 16.3 10.3 3.0
8/24 218.0 3.2 90.5 1.3 18.9 9.4 1.5
RubyMac® (B. Thome Mac cv / PP #19,891)
8/24 236.0 3.5 88.0 2.2 15.5 11.9 4.5
8/17 196.9 3.3 80.0 2.8 19.7 11.1 2.7
Smokehouse
9/8 289.5 3.5 41.0 2.5 19.8 14.5 4.9
Sweet Maia® (MAIA-SM cv.)
8/3 160.4 2.9 60 2.2 25.4 11.8 4.2

Berks County

Table 4. Fruit quality parameters of selected apple cultivars collected in Berks County. Historical values are retained for reference for those in northern regions of the state.
Date Mass
(g)
Diameter
(in)
Red Color
(%)
Background
(1-5)
Firmness
(lb)
Soluble Solids
(°Bx)
Starch Index
(1-8)
Gala
8/24 147.7 2.1 66.9 1.0 21.7 13.3 3.7
8/17 143.2 2.1 77.0 1.0 23.8 12.7 1.9
8/10 107.8 2.1 55.5 1.8 25.1 11.3 1.0
Golden Delicious
9/8 206.1 2.3 33.0 3.3 17.4 13.4 2.7
Honeycrisp
8/24 187.7 2.4 50.5 2.3 16.4 14.0 3.8
8/17 167.2 2.4 63.0 2.1 17.5 14.4 3.8
8/10 184.4 2.5 39.0 3.0 19.5 13.0 1.0
8/3 121.3 2.1 39.5 2.9 23.1 12.0 <unavailable>
Red Delicious
9/8 223.6 2.4 81.0 1.0 17.4 10.6 2.1
8/31 216.3 2.4 75.5 1.2 17.7 10.5 2.0

Acknowledgements

Starch index values were determined by referencing the Starch Index Scale published by Dr. Randy Beaudry and the MSU Apple Maturity Program at Michigan State University. The page referenced by the hyperlink provides access to a PDF copy of the document that can be freely download.

Starch indexing for RubyMac® and Smokehouse utilized the Cornell scale found in Predicting Harvest Date Windows for Apples by Blanpied and Silsby (1992).

Because of low crop set throughout our usual sampling regions, we are indebted to the following orchards for sacrificing fruit each week to make these reports possible:

  • In Adams County, Penn State wishes to thank Hollabaugh Bros., Inc., in Biglerville, and Hector Mateos in particular for his assistance.
  • In Berks County, Penn State wishes to thank Keim Orchard and Frecon Farms in Boyertown, and Ben Keim and Steve Frecon especially for their collaboration.

Their kindness and generosity deserves acknowledgement.

Penn State wishes to thank Rice Fruit Company for material support that help make these reports possible.

Conclusions

Commercial fruit growers, please note: apple maturity conditions need to be monitored at a local level within one's own orchard. Before chemical products are applied, be sure to comply with current federal, state, and local usage regulations and examine the product label. Product information can be easily obtained online from CDMS.

This series of updates is made possible by a State Horticultural Association of Pennsylvania (SHAP) Extension Grant (Pennsylvania Apple Maturity Program). The authors thank SHAP for the funding.