News

2026 Pennsylvania Tree Fruit Maturity Report - August 24

The Tree Fruit Maturity Report is a weekly program to inform producers about the maturity of the most common apple cultivars sampled from two regions represented by two Pennsylvania counties: Adams and Berks.
Updated:
August 25, 2026

Introduction

Welcome to Penn State Extension's weekly apple maturity reports. Maturity metrics for key varieties will be tracked across the state throughout the 2026 season.

In this stressful year, with crops decimated by multiple springtime freeze events and hot, dry early summer weather, informed harvest timing recommendations are critical for fruit quality, particularly for apples in mid- to long-term storage. Balancing harvest decisions against sugar accumulation, color development, starch clearing, and firmness drop is difficult to perform in a normal year. These reports serve to provide insight and help inform management decisions.

Out of respect for our collaborators' need to squeeze out as much profit as possible from their available fruit, sampling of varieties may occur a week or more later than in previous years in order to reduce Penn State Extension's impact on their harvest. Please bear this in mind as recommendations this year may require quick action.

Adams County

Discussion

Last week brought a welcome cool-down after the recent hot stretch, with daytime highs easing into the mid-to-upper 70s and low 80s and overnight lows dropping into the 50s and low 60s. That wider swing between warm days and cool nights is exactly the kind of weather that drives red color development, since cooler nights slow respiration and help fruit hold onto sugars while boosting anthocyanin production, and it's a big part of why we saw such a jump in red color across multiple varieties this week, Gala, RubyMac®, and the Fujis in particular.

This week looks like more of the same: highs mostly in the low-to-upper 80s with overnight lows in the mid-60s, staying partly to mostly sunny, with only a scattered thunderstorm chance midweek and later in the week. With the cool nights continuing, color should keep improving quickly, and this looks like a solid stretch for harvest work overall.

One of the varieties featured in this week's report—September Wonder® Fuji—presented a few interesting surprises.  It was quickly observed during collection that only a few trees near the top of the hill had a reasonable set of fruit, while others were completely barren (Figure 1).  At first impression, this was assumed to be due to freeze damage variation due to topography, but that was not borne out by additional observation. Alternating strips of laden and unladen healthy trees were throughout the block, leaving Fuji’s biennial tendencies as the most likely culprit.

A row of September Wonder® Fuji trees shows the severity of biennial bearing. Two adjacent trees receiving the same treatments for care and the same rebloom sprays have drastically different crop loads, with the first bearing a crop close to expected for a normal year and the other completely barren.
Figure 1. Biennial bearing in Fuji (September Wonder®) observed in Adams County. Photo by Daniel E. Weber, Penn State.

Our collaborator said that this particular strain has been incredibly difficult to break out of the biennial cycle. So, a word of warning if seeking an early strain of Fuji: until additional research can be conducted on this particular strain and why it appears to be recalcitrant to return bloom sprays, it may be worthwhile to consider another.

The second surprise was the extent of seedlessness observed.  A significant number of fruits harvested were seedless (Figure 2). Several additional varieties examined this week were found to have a significant number of seedless fruit (Buckeye® Gala, Super Chief® Red Delicious, and RubyMac®).

A cardboard tray has been filled with September Wonder® Fuji fruit, cut along the equator to reveal the locules and seed cavity.  A significant number of these fruit show entirely empty locules, dark locules with no seeds, some seeds in an otherwise normal core, or full seed set.
Figure 2. A significant fraction of September Wonder® Fuji fruit collected this week were found to be seedless or partially seedless.  There are ten pieces of fruit in this photo, cut in half. The top halves of the fruit are in rows 1 and 3, while the bottom halves are in rows 2 and 4. For example, the mate to the top half found in the upper left corner can be found "southeast" as the first bottom half in row 2. Photo by Daniel E. Weber, Penn State.

This condition does not appear to have affected fruit development except in Buckeye® Gala where the fruit remained small despite abundant rainfall. (Rainfall, which induced significant cracking in Gala (Figure 3).

A small cluster of three Buckeye® Gala fruit are observed in our cooperator orchard. The fruit is split on both sides of the stem, approximately half-way down the sides.
Figure 3. A cluster of cracked Buckeye® Gala. Photo by Daniel E. Weber, Penn State.

Varietal Analysis

Table 1. Fruit quality parameters of selected apple cultivars collected in Adams County. Rows in bold indicate most recent data. Historical values are retained for reference for those in northern regions of the state.
Date Mass
(g)
Diameter
(in)
Red Color
(%)
Background
(1-5)
Firmness
(lb)
Soluble Solids
(°Bx)
Starch Index
(1-8)
Fuji (Daybreak™ / Rankin cv.)
8/24 244.0 3.3 81.9 1.3 17.6 13.7 4.6
Fuji (September Wonder®)
8/24 298.0 3.5 48.5 1.7 15.8 11.9 4.6
Gala (Buckeye®)
8/24 188.0 2.9 90.9 1.2 21.2 11.5 4.9
8/17 160.4 2.7 72.0 1.1 22.5 10.2 4.1
8/10 157.2 2.7 72.0 1.1 25.4 10.7 2.7
8/3 147.2 2.7 42.0 1.5 26.5 9.9 3.0
Jonathan
8/24 198.0 3.2 86.0 2.7 17.2 10.9 5.9
Red Delicious (Super Chief®)
8/24 218.0 3.2 90.5 1.3 18.9 9.4 1.5
RubyMac® (B. Thome Mac cv / PP #19,891)
8/24 236.0 3.5 88.0 2.2 15.5 11.9 4.5
8/17 196.9 3.3 80.0 2.8 19.7 11.1 2.7

The Gala (Buckeye®) block has already seen a first pick. Red color rose from 71.5% to 90.9%, firmness dropped from 22.5 to 21.2 lb, soluble solids ticked down slightly to 11.5 °Bx, and starch advanced from 4.1 to 4.9. Size increased only modestly to 188 g. This block has already finished its first pick, and with starch now approaching 5, it is past the window for long-term storage, so any remaining fruit should be prioritized for harvest now. Worth noting: most of the fruit analyzed for this report had barely any seeds, which significantly limited its size despite the rainfall received over the past few weeks.

RubyMac® moved in its maturity indexes quickly this week. Red color jumped from 79.5% to 88%, firmness dropped from 19.7 to 15.5 lb, soluble solids held near 11.9 °Bx, and starch advanced from 2.7 to 4.5. This block moved quickly and firmness is now dropping fast, so it should be harvested promptly.

In Adams County, a first picking of the original strain of Honeycrisp occurred, which is why it does not appear in this report.  Based on visual inspection of the fruit on the trees of other strains, it is likely that the other strains are at or near harvest potential. These should be inspected closely in local orchards.

There were some new varieties measured for the first time this week:

Fuji (Daybreak™/Rankin) came in at 244 g with strong red color (81.9%), firmness of 17.6 lb, soluble solids of 13.7 °Bx, and a starch index of 4.6. Sugars are excellent and starch is moderate; this strain can be harvested immediately as it already mature and has developed excellent color.

Fuji (September Wonder®) measured 298 g with 48.5% red color, firmness of 15.8 lb, soluble solids of 11.9 °Bx, and starch at 4.6. Color is well behind Daybreak Fuji but starch is tracking similarly, so despite the lighter finish this strain is not far behind internally. This strain can be harvested this week as well, if growers are waiting for color development in this variety and are harvesting this variety next week, then it could shorten its storage potential.

Jonathan came in at 198 g with excellent red color (86%), firmness of 17.2 lb, soluble solids of 10.9 °Bx, and a starch index of 5.9. This is a high starch reading, meaning that Jonathan fruit are overmature and it is already well into its harvest window and should be prioritized and harvested soon, and can only be stored for short-term storage of a couple months.

Red Delicious (Super Chief®) measured 218 g with the highest red color of the day at 90.5%, firmness of 18.9 lb, soluble solids of 9.4 °Bx, and starch at just 1.5. Starch conversion has barely started. Keep an eye out over the next few weeks as starch continues to develop.

The image depicts two sets of Fuji apples each: Fuji (Daybreak™ / Rankin cv.) grouped on the left and Fuji (September Wonder®) grouped on the right. Each set of ten fruit is viewed from three different angles and cut open and stained for starch-iodine testing. The four views are: (top) a top-down view of the fruit (looking down into the stem cavity); (top-middle) a view of one side of the fruit so the coloration of the skin becomes more apparent; (top-bottom) a view of the opposite side of the fruit to reveal the background color; and, (bottom) a top-down view of the fruit cut in half across the equator and stained with a type of Lugol\'s solution for starch-iodine indexing. The order of the fruit is consistent in each of the four variety views so one may compare the appearance of the fruit and correlated that with the starch-iodine index. For an interpretation of the foreground, background, and starch index see the accompanying report.
Figure 4. Fuji (Daybreak™ / Rankin cv.) (L) and Fuji (September Wonder®) (R). Side views for "front" and "back" were collected to provide a more complete picture of coloration. Collected in Adams County. Photo by Daniel E. Weber, Penn State.
The image depicts two sets of apples each: Gala (Buckeye®) on the left and Jonathan on the right. Each set of ten fruit is viewed from three different angles and cut open and stained for starch-iodine testing. The four views are: (top) a top-down view of the fruit (looking down into the stem cavity); (top-middle) a view of one side of the fruit so the coloration of the skin becomes more apparent; (top-bottom) a view of the opposite side of the fruit to reveal the background color; and, (bottom) a top-down view of the fruit cut in half across the equator and stained with a type of Lugol\'s solution for starch-iodine indexing. The order of the fruit is consistent in each of the four variety views so one may compare the appearance of the fruit and correlated that with the starch-iodine index. For an interpretation of the foreground, background, and starch index see the accompanying report.
Figure 5. Gala (Buckeye®) (L) and Jonathan (R). Side views for "front" and "back" were collected to provide a more complete picture of coloration. Collected in Adams County. Photo by Daniel E. Weber, Penn State.
The image depicts two sets of apples each: A modern strain of Red Delicious called "Super Chief®" on the left and a dark strain of McIntosh called RubyMac® (B. Thome Mac cv / PP #19,891) on the right. Each set of ten fruit is viewed from three different angles and cut open and stained for starch-iodine testing. The four views are: (top) a top-down view of the fruit (looking down into the stem cavity); (top-middle) a view of one side of the fruit so the coloration of the skin becomes more apparent; (top-bottom) a view of the opposite side of the fruit to reveal the background color; and, (bottom) a top-down view of the fruit cut in half across the equator and stained with a type of Lugol\'s solution for starch-iodine indexing. The order of the fruit is consistent in each of the four variety views so one may compare the appearance of the fruit and correlated that with the starch-iodine index. For an interpretation of the foreground, background, and starch index see the accompanying report.
Figure 6. Red Delicious (Super Chief®) (L) and RubyMac® (B. Thome Mac cv / PP #19,891) (R). Side views for "front" and "back" were collected to provide a more complete picture of coloration. Collected in Adams County. Photo by Daniel E. Weber, Penn State.

Berks County

Discussion

Overall, Gala and Honeycrisp at Berks are still a few days behind Adams County, where both varieties were already being harvested last week. Both these varieties are now ready for harvest this week. Prioritize blocks going into long-term storage first.

Varietal Analysis

Table 2. Fruit quality parameters of selected apple cultivars collected in Berks County. Rows in bold indicate most recent data. Historical values are retained for reference for those in northern regions of the state.
Date Mass
(g)
Diameter
(in)
Red Color
(%)
Background
(1-5)
Firmness
(lb)
Soluble Solids
(°Bx)
Starch Index
(1-8)
Gala
8/24 147.7 2.1 66.9 1.0 21.7 13.3 3.7
8/17 143.2 2.1 77.0 1.0 23.8 12.7 1.9
8/10 107.8 2.1 55.5 1.8 25.1 11.3 1.0
Honeycrisp
8/24 187.7 2.4 50.5 2.3 16.4 14.0 3.8
8/17 167.2 2.4 63.0 2.1 17.5 14.4 3.8
8/10 184.4 2.5 39.0 3.0 19.5 13.0 1.0
8/3 121.3 2.1 39.5 2.9 23.1 12.0 <unavailable>

Gala continued to advance internally this week, Red blush color stayed the same for the most part. Firmness dropped from 23.8 to 21.7 lb, soluble solids rose to 13.3 °Bx, and starch nearly doubled from 1.9 to 3.7. Fruit sizes held steady around 148 g. With starch climbing quickly and firmness starting to soften, this block is at its harvest window and should be harvested.

Honeycrisp also kept progressing, though at a more measured pace than last week's jump. Firmness dropped further from 17.5 to 16.4 lb, soluble solids held strong near 14.0 °Bx, and starch was essentially flat at 3.8. Fruit averaged 188 g. Firmness continues to soften and sugars remain high, so this block is also at harvest maturity. Fruit destined for medium- or long-term storage should be picked soon rather than held for more color, while short-term sale blocks have a bit more flexibility.

The image depicts ten Gala apples on the left and ten Honeycrisp apples on the right, viewed from two different angles and cut open and stained for starch-iodine testing. The three views are: (left) a top-down view of the fruit (looking down into the stem cavity); (middle) a view of one side of the fruit so the coloration of the skin becomes more apparent; and, (right) a top-down view of the fruit cut in half across the equator and stained with a type of Lugol\'s solution for starch-iodine indexing. The order of the fruit is consistent in each of the three views so one may compare the appearance of the fruit and correlated that with the starch-iodine index. For an interpretation of the foreground, background, and starch index see the accompanying report.
Figure 7. Gala (L) and Honeycrisp (R)) collected in Berks County. Photo by Don Seifrit, Penn State.

Historical Data

The tables below contain the data collected in previous weeks of this year's reporting cycle. It is provided to provide information to growers who may be in regions where these varieties are still developing and to serve as a historical record of the 2026 growing season. Please review the previous weeks' reports for information on harvesting.

Adams County

Table 3. Fruit quality parameters of selected apple cultivars collected in Adams County. Rows in bold indicate most recent data. Historical values are retained for reference for those in northern regions of the state.
Date Mass
(g)
Diameter
(in)
Red Color
(%)
Background
(1-5)
Firmness
(lb)
Soluble Solids
(°Bx)
Starch Index
(1-8)
Autumn Crisp (NY674 cv.)
8/17 288.4 3.6 26 1.5 17.4 12.6 5.1
8/10 221.1 3.3 21 2.1 17.0 12.0 3.4
Gala (Wildfire™)
7/27 174 2.9 97 1.1 21.4 12.9 5.2
Honeycrisp (Original Strain)
8/17 328.7 3.7 47 1.6 17.7 13.2 4.7
8/10 302.8 3.6 6 1.8 22.0 11.5 2.2
8/3 219.3 3.2 15 2.4 21.5 11.5 2.0
Honeycrisp (Premier®)
8/10 322.5 3.6 23 1.3 17.4 12.3 6.6
8/3 249.2 3.4 7 1.5 20.9 11.7 4.8
7/27 226 3.2 11 1.8 19.6 11.6 1.7
Honeycrisp (Royal Red® / PP #22,244)
8/17 307.2 3.6 58 1.5 20.1 12.6 3.3
Sweet Maia® (MAIA-SM cv.)
8/3 160.4 2.9 60 2.2 25.4 11.8 4.2

Berks County

None of the Berks varieties sampled have been harvested. Historical data will appear here when varieties cycle out of the weekly sampling and reporting.

Acknowledgements

Starch index values were determined by referencing the Starch Index Scale published by Dr. Randy Beaudry and the MSU Apple Maturity Program at Michigan State University. The page referenced by the hyperlink provides access to a PDF copy of the document that can be freely downloaded.

Starch indexing for RubyMac® utilized the Cornell scale found in Predicting Harvest Date Windows for Apples by Blanpied and Silsby (1992).

Because of low crop set throughout our usual sampling regions, we are indebted to the following orchards for sacrificing fruit each week to make these reports possible:

  • In Adams County, Penn State wishes to thank Hollabaugh Bros., Inc., in Biglerville, and Hector Mateos in particular for his assistance.
  • In Berks County, Penn State wishes to thank Keim Orchard and Frecon Farms in Boyertown, and Ben Keim and Steve Frecon especially for their collaboration.

Their kindness and generosity deserves acknowledgement.

Penn State wishes to thank Rice Fruit Company for material support that help make these reports possible.

Conclusions

Commercial fruit growers, please note: apple maturity conditions need to be monitored at a local level within one's own orchard. Before chemical products are applied, be sure to comply with current federal, state, and local usage regulations and examine the product label. Product information can be easily obtained online from CDMS.

This series of updates is made possible by a State Horticultural Association of Pennsylvania (SHAP) Extension Grant (Pennsylvania Apple Maturity Program). The authors thank SHAP for the funding.