Removing Giardia Cysts from Drinking Water
CLICK HERE FOR A PRINTABLE (PDF) VERSION
In the mid 1980s several Pennsylvania communities experienced outbreaks of a waterborne disease called Giardiasis.
Hundreds of citizens suffered with symptoms ranging from mild nausea to
acute, severe intestinal distress. How did the Giardia cysts enter
drinking water supplies? Studies showed that the outbreaks occurred in
communities with inadequate chlorination systems, improperly operated
and maintained filtration equipment, and even unfiltered water supplies.
Since water supplies are not regularly tested for Giardia,
the contamination was not detected until it was too late and entire
communities had been exposed to contaminated drinking water.
From a health standpoint, Giardia has no longterm health effects. However, EPA studies conducted in Pennsylvania communities reveal that even a single Giardia outbreak
may require investment in high cost filtration systems. For residents
receiving water from private wells, the presence of Giardia cysts
from unfiltered water, although unlikely, may indicate that other
contaminants are making it to the tap, as well. In either case, everyone
will agree that the illness-causing cysts must be removed.
What is Giardiasis?
Giardiasis is a gastrointestinal illness caused by the introduction of Giardia
cysts from human or animal wastes into water supplies. The microscopic
cysts are capable of surviving in cold water for extended periods of
time. Mammals, such as beavers, that spend time in or near water have
been implicated in some Giardia
outbreaks, but many animals as well
as humans are known to carry the disease. Ingested by the host animal,
the cyst develops into the adult protozoan life stage and attaches
itself to the wall of the small intestine at the outlet of the stomach.
There it reproduces cysts which can develop and infect other hosts. One
gram of feces from an infected animal may contain as many as two million
cysts. Diarrhea, abdominal cramps, and gas are among the common
symptoms that may appear within 1-4 weeks after cyst ingestion.
Giardiasis
affects persons of all ages. Medication will eliminate the organism
from the intestines, but reoccurrence of the symptoms occurs in some
individuals.
Preventing Giardiasis
Detection of Giardia cysts is difficult and often doesn’t occur until an individual becomes infected. Testing water for Giardia requires filtering several hundred
gallons
of water and having a trained analyst inspect the filter with a
microscope. If no cysts are present, there is still no guarantee that
none exist in the water supply. The Department of Environmental
Protection (DEP) currently samples public water supplies for Giardia and
more stringently enforces regulations concerning proper operation and
maintenance of water treatment plants to insure removal of the cysts. If
you suspect that Giardia contamination has occurred, you should contact
your local community water company or the DEP.
For individuals
drawing water from private wells, the safeguarding of the water supply
rests on the individual. Where deep (greater than 80') groundwater
sources are used for water supply, Giardia cysts are usually not a
problem. However, if surface water seeps directly into a well, Giardia
can contaminate even the deepest well. A well casing that extends above
the surface of the ground and is properly grouted will keep surface
water out of the well.
Springs and shallow wells have high
contamination probabilities because there is inadequate soil filtration
of the water flowing into these systems.
Removing Giardia Cysts
Removing Giardia cysts before they reach the tap usually involves
disinfection to inactivate the cysts and filtration through a fine media
to physically remove the cysts from the water. Because Giardia cysts
are resistant to normal disinfection, filtration is usually required.
Cysts are large in comparison to bacteria and viruses (ranging from 7-10
microns in diameter); consequently, they are more easily removed by
filtration.
Both disinfection and filtration processes are used
in combination at municipal plants to protect water supplies and assure
customers of high quality drinking water. Home water treatment
techniques and devices are also available to assist water users in
effectively removing Giardia. Techniques such as superchlorination,
boiling, and manufactured treatment devices are available to the
homeowner.
Because normal chlorine levels used to kill bacteria
in water supplies will not inactivate Giardia cysts, super chlorination
is required. Figure 1 shows a comparison of approximate chlorine levels
necessary to inactivate bacteria compared to Giardia cysts. Not only is a
higher concentration of chlorine in the water necessary but increased
contact time is required. Super chlorination can effectively eliminate
one-time contamination events. The strong smell and taste of chlorine at
this level will make the water unpalatable for a short period of time.
Comparison between normal and super chlorination for disinfection.
An alternative to chlorination is boiling. Boiling
is a simple, effective means of killing Giardia cysts. It is also a
method that can be used away from home on camping and hiking trips. To
inactivate the cysts, bring water to a full boil for 1 minute on a stove
or in a microwave. The heat from a hot water tank is not sufficient to inactivate Giardia cysts.
Boiling water is a viable, temporary solution to giardia contamination.
Since boiling often leaves water with a bland taste, you may wish to
purchase bottled water in lieu of boiling drinking water (See F 142
Bottled Water fact sheet).
Manufactured treatment devices also
remove Giardia cysts. Various filters are probably the most common
devices used. They are constructed of very fine media that traps small
particles like bacteria, cysts and sediment. Sand, diatomaceous earth,
spiral wound fiber, ceramic and activated carbon are five common media
used for filtration. Figure 2 shows how the filtration process works to
trap Giardia and other water constituents. The most widely available
filter for point-of-use/point-of-entry treatment is the activated carbon
filter (ACF). Many types of ACFs are currently on the market. Tap
mounted filters attach to the the faucet and pour through models work
like automatic drip coffee makers. High volume models are
installed under the sink.
Although
many people believe that filters are a fail-safe treatment, filters are
ineffective unless properly maintained and operated. As Figure 2 shows,
where undisinfected water is used, filters are susceptible to bacterial
growths which plug and coat the filters, reduce the filtering capacity,
and create a source of bacterial contamination. For this reason, only
disinfected water should be filtered. Filters must also be cleaned
regularly and replaced. Filters such as the tap mounted type must be
changed at least every six months. Read the manufacturers instructions
to make sure that you are properly maintaining your filter.
An activated carbon filter with a partially spent filter.
Other Disinfection Methods
A disinfection process widely used in European water treatment plants, is now emerging as a home treatment technology in the United States. Ozone, a strong oxidizing gas, is injected into water and kills bacteria and Giardia cysts with less contact time than other disinfection processes. Unlike chlorination, ozone leaves no after taste or residues and has been found to be more effective and more costly at Giardia deactivation than chlorine.
Some manufacturers have also marketed Reverse Osmosis (RO) and ultraviolet light equipment for Giardia treatment. Reverse Osmosis devices are compact units designed to force pressurized water through a semi-permeable membrane. Contaminants are left on one side of the membrane while clean water flows out the other side. Tests conducted on RO have shown that in the long run, the membrane becomes less and less effective at removing Giardia cysts. UV light, a process that passes water through a chamber housing a quartz mercury lamp, has also been shown to kill cysts. These processes have not proven to be consistently effective at Giardia removal; consequently, they are not recommended for this use.



